Piss, shit, puss, sperm

 

The Pursuit of Fecality

There where it smells of shit
it smells of being.
Man could just as well not have shat,
not have opened the anal pouch,
but he chose to shit
as he would have chosen to live
instead of consenting to live dead.

Because in order not to make caca,
he would have had to consent
not to be,
but he could not make up his mind to lose
being,
that is, to die alive.

There is in being
something particularly tempting for man
and this something is none other than
CACA.
(Roaring here.)

To exist one need only let oneself be,
but to live,
one must be someone,
to be someone,
one must have a BONE,
not be afraid to show the bone,
and to lose the meat in the process.

Man has always preferred meat
to the earth of bones.
Because there was only earth and wood of bone,
and he had to earn his meat,
there was only iron and fire
and no shit,
and man was afraid of losing shit
or rather he desired shit
and, for this, sacrificed blood.

[…]

Antonin Artaud, To Have Done with the Judgment of God / 1948

Kiki Smith, Tale, 1992

Kiki Smith, Tale, 1992

La Recherche de la Fécalité

Là ou ça sent la merde
ça sent l’être.
L’homme aurait très bien pu ne pas chier,
ne pas ouvrir la poche anale,
mais il a choisi de chier
comme il aurait choisi de vivre
au lieu de consentir à vivre mort.

C’est que pour ne pas faire caca,
il lui aurait fallu consentir
à ne pas être,
mais il n’a pas pu se résoudre à perdre
l’être,
c’est-à-dire à mourir vivant.

Il y a dans l’être
quelque chose de particulièrement tentant pour l’homme
et ce quelque chose est justement
LE CACA.
(Ici rugissements.)

Pour exister il suffit de se laisser aller à être,
mais pour vivre,
il faut être quelqu’un,
pour être quelqu’un,
il faut avoir un os,
ne pas avoir peur de montrer l’os,
et de perdre la viande en passant.

L’homme a toujours mieux aimé la viande
que la terre des os.
C’est qu’il n’y avait que de la terre et du bois d’os,
et il lui a fallu gagner sa viande,
il n’y avait que du fer et du feu
et pas de merde,
et l’homme a eu peur de perdre la merde
ou plutôt il a désiré la merde
et, pour cela, sacrifié le sang.

[…]

Antonin Artaud, Pour en finir avec le jugement de dieu / 1948

Kiki Smith, Pee Body, 1992

Kiki Smith, Pee Body, 1992

In Artaud’s words, living sounds like a fatality. Or should I say human condition sounds like a fatality. Starting a poem with shit is bold… and repulsive. He does not beat around the bush, instead he bluntly states what we are full of, shit.

“There where it smells of shit, it smells of being.” This could indeed seem like a reduction of humanity to a digestive tract but whoever would go against this statement is in denial. There would be nothing more unhuman than not defecating.

But other than going against nature, if someone was to stop excreting the colon would rupture, resulting in a true internal mess.   

And yet, this act, that is something so natural, so primal, and most important viral, is hidden, shamed, denied.

 

This need to deny and reject something that is ultimately a part of us, that is us, is caused by the dissociation that happens the second something exits our body and lands in the outside world, becoming an undefined abject thing that we can observe from the outside.

Observing, analysing and judging are concepts only engrained and enabled by a human brain full of social constructs. An animal would never look at its feces and then think anything of it or judge itself for doing what is natural for it to do.

 

As we know, society is based on rules, order and approval of the majority. What Kristeva states perfectly is her essay on abjection “Powers of horror” is that abjection has to do with “what disturbs identity, system, order. What does not respect borders, positions, rules”

And a part of us, that ends up outside of us is the materialisation of that. We do not want to face with the harsh reality of our humanity.

Not judging our shit, not being disgusted by it would bring us closer to what is animal, primal.


Gelitin, Vorm, Fellows, Attitude, 2018

Gelitin, Vorm, Fellows, Attitude, 2018

When thinking about the elitist closed circle that represent the art world, it is both funny and ironic to think that pee and poop talk would end being part of its colorful landscape. It is usually considered immature, lacking in depth and often associated with children’s talk.

 

However, when these kind of subjects land in the hands of artists it is always for cathartic reasons. Both Austrian (male) collective Gelitin and female American artist Kiki Smith approach the theme of shit and piss. Both approach are very different but with the same exact intention: accepting ourselves for what we are (made of), what is part of us, (all of us) and what connects us with our primal instincts.

Kiki Smith’s pieces, Tale and Pee Body both depict naked female bodies in very exposed and vulnerable position. What both of them have in common is the fact that we are looking at them as they are doing something that we usually do in complete intimacy. But the vulnerability of the pieces is an indispensable part; looking at them make us feel shame, ashamed to be looking as the embodiment of shame. Or are we seeing shame because that’s what we would feel if we were to take their place. But whichever it is, it is nonetheless a humbling artwork. Kiki Smith onces explained in an interview that the fecal trail in Tale is also a metaphor for our emotional baggage, that we tend to bottle up and keep in, which is toxic, exactly like keeping actual waste inside, so instead she lets go of it, becoming a release for her as an artist, but also for the viewer.  


Gelitin, Zapf de Pipi, 2

Gelitin, Zapf de Pipi, 2005

zapfdepipi1_700.jpg

With Gelitin on the other hand, bodily fluids are always treated with a humorous and playful approach. They are not simply the repulsing result of a primal human need, instead they become the protagonist of the piece, the thing around which the whole narrative of the piece evolves. Piss becomes like any other material, as much as paint or clay are.

 

Zapf de pipi is a perfect example  are that, nothing as simple as a black bucket with an hollow bottom, and an outside temperature that would frieze any droplets of water instantly. They created a gigantic 7 meters long stalagmite of pee. A collaborative piece where the pee of over 200 different people joint into a 100% natural sculpture.

What makes these bodily builds amusing instead of repulsing is their decontextualization , they are not hidden and shamed, instead they are blown out of proportions, made giant, (Vorm – Fellows – Attitude) and in a way glorified. Our shit is not the decline of our humanity but instead the thing that brings us all together, the thing that everyone truly does but always hides shamefully.  

d1992_033_place.jpg

Anthony Gormley, Bodily fluids series, 1986-1992

Anthony Gormley, Bodily fluids series, 1986-1992

Anthony Gormley, Bodily fluids series, 1986-1992

During these years, Gormley used his bodily fluids (blood, sperm) and a material to create drawings. He considers that the act of creating with our organic materials implies a sacrificial dimension, and plays with he notion of scared and “pollution”. The offering of blood is sacred, and semen contains, life, but both are at the same “dirty” abject things, that once out of the body starts deteriorating and decomposing. Using fluids to create art is a way to memorialise them; “the pain and pleasure, the putrefied and sublimated”

The way he approached these drawings is the same way our bodies spill fluids out with no control, in a completely accidental and random manner. He allows the splash of blood or semen to take life and then freeze themselves onto the surface of the paper.

2000_CKS_06370_0146_000().jpg

Andres Serrano, Blood and Semen II, 1990