Carbon

Chauvet cave, 36,000 B.C

Chauvet cave, 36,000 B.C

Carbon is the chemical element that is found in both graphite and charcoal, and that makes it probably one of the oldest materials ever used to make art.

 

During the Paleolithic era, caveman would use various natural pigments to realize their cave paintings. Reds were made with iron oxide, white with grounded calcite and black with charcoal.

While natural pigments are still used in painting, charcoal is the most common tool that was used by artists, apprentice, students, amateur artist, and anyone who ever wanted to try making some art. It is one of the most accessible and primal tool.

Prehistorical art is all about making a mark and leaving a trace behind. In our modern times we make a trace every day. Randomly doodling when bored, writing an address down or making a grocery list. All these are mundane actions, but they are still the physical mark of someone’s thoughts, life and words.

When reflecting on that idea, I cannot think of one home I visited in my life and that did not have at least one pencil.

 
Morgan O’hara, Live Transmission drawing David Greilsammer performing Mozart, 2009

Morgan O’hara, Live Transmission drawing David Greilsammer performing Mozart, 2009

In her series of drawing Live Transmission, Morgan O’Hara used sharpened pencils to transcribe onto paper live actions happening in front of her eyes. She holds a pen (sometimes two, three or more) in each hands), sits in front of her subject becoming entirely captivated by what is happening in front of her. From musicians to dancers and cook, what she is interested in is that movement, the sounds and the whole sensory experience of being the witness of such scenes. Instead of drawing the bodies (the anatomy) in movement, she draws the movement itself, or the space that these very movements occupy.

When starting one of these drawings, O’Hara almost never looks at her picture, she is captivated by what she is looking and lets it inhabit both her arms, as if in a trance.

She is able to give life to simple random lines. We could almost mistake a child scribbling on a white paper, discovering the magic of making lines for the first time. However, unlike a child’s drawing, when looking at one of O’Hara’s drawings we can feel that although there is a big place for accidents, there is equally an artist that is present physically and mentally, and that thinking of the way her hands dances of the paper and of the trace she is leaving behind.

Morgan O’hara, Live Transmission drawing John Tilbury at Café Oto, 2014

Morgan O’hara, Live Transmission drawing John Tilbury at Café Oto, 2014

 
Schneemann_UptoAndIncludingHerLimits-469x355.jpg

Carolee Schneemann, Up to and including her limits, 1971-1976

Carolee Schneemann is an artist for whom movement, and the space that occupies the body is central to her art practice. She often uses the word “kinetic” to talk about her work.

In her performance Up to and Including her limits, Schneemann places herself in a tree surgeon harness that is floating in between three big sheets of paper (on the walls and floor). While she in using crayons (and not charcoal, as I thought when first seeing the black and white picture) she, like O’Hara want to capture and transcribe movements onto a paper. She explains that her first interest doing so was because she initially wanted to see how it felt like to be in a harness and let is sway, surrendering the body to the sensation of floating and being moved by an external object attached to the body. It is actually a in between control and letting go, because the harness makes her sway, but each movement will be influenced by the way and the intensity in which the crayon hits the walls. She adds, that she was inspired by Pollock’s action painting, wanting to include the whole body and the space into the making of a work.

Here again, as mentioned, we almost feel that this approach is a playful way of approaching mark making; I make a random and half accidental line on a wall as I am swaying in the air, to which another line is going to add itself, over and over.

Rebecca Horn, Pencil mask, 1972

Rebecca Horn, Pencil mask, 1972

005.jpg

In the same spirit, Rebecca Horn finds her own way of using her body in unconventional ways to make a mark (or marks). She creates a Pencil Mask, in the style of a revisited pinhead. The only thing we usually use to draw or write are our hands, but actually what we mostly use in our daily life to do any actions are also our hands. Here, Horn wants to transform the wearer’s (her) head, into an instrument of drawing, the head is not only a head, but transforms into the tip of a pencil. When explaining this piece, she says

 “All pencils are about two inches long and produce the profile of my face in three dimensions...I move my body rhythmically from left to right in front of a white wall. The pencils make marks on the wall the image of which corresponds to the rhythm of my movements.’

 

Putting these three artists next to each other, the common thread that connects them is this desire of making a random mark onto a white surface, but using rhythm, movements and space as tools that are almost more important that the material itself and then the result. It is the experience of the action being made and being materialized into a line (a mark) that is important here, It is wanting to give a shape and form to things that initially don’t have one, things that belong to the empty space and live in our imagination and that only live and dies in the same instant.

The movement of a head going left and right, that feels like a nod, like a way of saying no, would never be registered normally, but here, every time her heads goes from one side to another, each single movement leaves  its trace.

Cy Twombly, Untitled, 1975

Cy Twombly, Untitled, 1975

American abstract expressionist artist Cy Twombly’s work is a never-ending poetry of scribbles. When seeing his work in the flesh for the first time in Paris (Centre Pompidou) I was accompanied by two friends who were quite unsettled (to say the least) when first seeing his work, and had a hard time understanding why I would spend minutes on end looking at what they called “a child’s first discovery of a pencil”. They were not completely wrong there, and this is probably the most charming and touching part of Twombly’s work. We was always an advocate for “ugly handwritings” and children’s drawings.

Art in the popular culture, is always thought to be full of “skills” and by skills I mean a perfect notion of perspective, light and shadow, depth, anatomy, in short of everything that would demonstrate of a level of accuracy when representing reality. But here, we are faced with the celebration of imperfection, imprecision, and approximation.

When trying to think of the shape of our thoughts, their colors, their logic, and the way they connect to each other they are far from being straightforward and completely clear, and being comforted to Twombly’s paintings I always feel I am having a peak at what’s happening inside his head, of as if his thoughts just exploded onto the surface he is working on with no filter and control, in all honestly. There is something very freeing in his work, as if he was forcing us to tap into our inner child part and reconnect with our first experience of holding a pen and enjoying the simple act of leaving a mark and of realizing that our movements can actually create something, whatever this thing is and looks like.

It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more. Or maybe you have a creative project to share with the world. Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

 
Ithell Colquhoun, Small doodle on scarp paper, 1971

Ithell Colquhoun, Small doodle on scarp paper, 1971

 
Nam June Paik, Untitled, 1996

Nam June Paik, Untitled, 1996

Ithell Colquhoun, Small doodle and notes on used envelope, 1971

Ithell Colquhoun, Small doodle and notes on used envelope, 1971

Michelangelo, A study of a seated nude man for the 'Battle of Cascina', 1504-5

Michelangelo, A study of a seated nude man for the 'Battle of Cascina', 1504-5

Frank Auerbach, Head of Ruth, 1994-95

Frank Auerbach, Head of Ruth, 1994-95

A more traditional use of charcoal in the arts have been for the representation of figures.

The transcription and interpretation of our bodies has been a recurrent and central element in artistic practices. By drawing a body, still or in movement, helps us understand it better. Understand its shape, they muscles move, tense, and the way everything is held by our bone structure.

With such a common material that is carbon, and “basic” thematic that is the body, artists offer us throughout the ages their underlying intentions when representing the body, all having a very personal interpretation, because all picking up and being sensitive to various traits.

 

Michelangelo’s representation of the (male) body is always embellished, perfected with each muscle showing. There is a clear desire or getting closer to perfection when it comes to representing the anatomy. A sort of cannon, and idealization of the human shape is shown here.

 

But as we get closer and closer in time, we can almost see a decline in figure representation. The bodies or faces are disturbed, fragmented, distorted, sometimes menacing. It is not the accuracy or the perfection of the human shape that is put to the forefront but rather what lies under, what happens behind the face, under the skin and inside our minds. The magic of art making is that it gives life to the lifeless, shape to what is formless and uncovers truths that we do not want to dig out. What makes it even more magical is that a tool as simple as a charcoal stick or a graphite pen, transforms into a wand-like object that opens up endless possibilities.

Francis Bacon, Sketch for “Seated woman”, 1959-61

Francis Bacon, Sketch for “Seated woman”, 1959-61

 
Mike Kelley, Mr. and Mrs. Hermaphrodite, 2005

Mike Kelley, Mr. and Mrs. Hermaphrodite, 2005